I think one reason it is difficult to convince certain people (including public officials) about safe bicycling practices is that several of them are counterintuitive to non-bicyclists. This would include things like:
* riding on the street is generally safer than sidewalk riding
* riding as far to the right as humanly possible is usually more dangerous than riding out in the lane closer to the motor traffic
* if the lane is very narrow it is usually safer and more comfortable to move towards the middle of the road (most non-bicyclists would assume that it's safer to move as far towards the edge as humanly possible)
* riding sidepaths is generally more dangerous than riding the streets they parallel etc.
One tack I tried to take in our Kansas City advocacy was to say that "Before I started bicycling seriously I used to believe XYZ just like you
did." I explained that I ccould see where they are coming from and that I, too, used to believe XYZ was the logical and reasonable position. Then I explain how I came to change my mind about the issue (the research I did, how at first I didn't believe it could be true, but then I tried it, and so on).
I thought this was pretty effective, but of course what is really effective in a particular case depends a lot of the particular circumstances and personalities involved.
--Brent
posted by Brent Hugh at
Sunday, October 20, 2002 |
permanently archived here