On-Street Bicycling Safety Fact Sheet

[Return to Brent Hugh's Home Page]
[View the On-Street Bicycling Safety Fact Sheet in printable PDF format]
(If you see a blank page when viewing the PDF: right-click the link, save to hard drive, and view from there)

Bicycle safety is a complex subject and many findings contradict the "common sense" of motor vehicle drivers. For that reason, in a separate letter I have written in some detail to carefully explain sources of data and reasons the data makes sense.

This page is an executive summary of the conclusions. Please note that conclusions are not controversial, are well known and accepted by highway safety engineers, and are encoded into national standards such as AASHTO guidelines and the Uniform Vehicle Code. The conclusions are often surprising to non-bicyclists (including myself when I first looked into on-street bicycle safety facts), so please read with an open mind and feel free to double-check the sources:

  1. Bicycling is a Safe Activity

  1. Bicycling On-Street (even on 35 MPH+ streets) is Safer than Cycling on Off-Street Paths or Sidewalks

  1. Adding Bicycle Improvements (Bike Lanes, Wide Outside Lanes) Improves Safety Even Further

  1. On-Street Bicycle Facilities are Not Only Safe, but Also the Only Practical Way to Make Bicycling a Realistic Transportation Alternative

Bicycle Safety Fact Sheet Sources

1. Failure Analysis Associates Inc, "Comparative Risk of Different Activities," Design News, October 4, 1993. See http://www.magma.ca/~ocbc/comparat.html

2. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, "Bicycling Crashes In Perspective," http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/bc/perspective_2000.htm

3. Ken Kifer, "Is Cycling Dangerous?" http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/health/risks.htm

4. Malcom Wardlaw, "Stepping Stones to a Better Cycling Future," a presentation to the British CTC/CCNconference in Chesterfield, England on 13th October 2001. See <http://www.bicyclinglife.COM/Library/SteppingStones.htm>.

Wardlaw argues, with some convincing facts and statistics to back him up, that the greater the number of bicycles on the road, the lower the rate of death from bicycle-vehicle accidents. If the number of bicyclists doubles, the number of accidents increases by only about 25%. The reasons are that (1) motorists who see bicycles frequently keep a lookout for bicycles and know how to drive safely in their presence and (2) motorists who have recently been on bicycle themselves drive more courteously and safely around bicyclists.

5. Failure Analysis Associates Inc, "Comparative Risk of Different Activities," Design News, October 4, 1993. See http://www.magma.ca/~ocbc/comparat.html

6. A. Drummond and F. Gee, "The Risks of Bicycle Accident Involvement," Monash University Accident Research Centre, 1988. See <http://sciweb.science.adelaide.edu.au/sundries/ph.nsf>.

7. V. Routley and J. Ozanne-Smith, "Sport Related Injuries--An Overview," Hazard, vol. 8 no. 1, October 1991. See <http://sciweb.science.adelaide.edu.au/sundries/ph.nsf>.

This is not to say that youth soccer, basketball, or football are highly dangerous activities. Rather, the point is that we usual consider these to be rather normal and harmless activities, and bicycling is many times safer yet.

8. British Medical Association, Cycling towards Health & Safety, 1992, Oxford U. Press.

9. "All-Cause Mortality Associated With Physical Activity During Leisure Time, Work, Sports, and Cycling to Work," Archives of Internal Medicine, 160:1621-1628

10. William E. Moritz, "Adult Bicyclists in the U.S.', Transportation Research Board , 1998. <http://www.bicyclinglife.com/Library/Moritz2.htm>.

Only about 5% of motor vehicle-bicycle collisions are "rear overtaking" accidents. By contrast, over 75% involve vehicles approaching from the front or sides at intersections.

The typical urban multi-use path has numerous awkward, low-visibility, poorly controlled intersections with streets. So these facilities decrease the least common type of accident (rear-overtaking) but vastly increase the more common type (intersections). That is one reason (of many) that this type of path is less safe than bicycling on-street.

For a bicycle riding on a sidewalk, every driveway becomes a dangerous intersection with poor sight-lines. Intersections with streets are awkward; a fast-moving cyclist can pop out into the street from a place no motorist expects a fast-moving vehicle to be. So it is no surprise that sidewalk riding is more dangerous than street riding.

Keep in mind that we are talking about relative safety and danger here. Neither off-street bicycle path riding nor sidewalk riding can be considered a highly dangerous activity--both are far safer than, say, motorcycle riding or flying general aviation, and about as safe as scuba diving. Bicycling is a generally safe activity and here we are splitting hairs about which type is a little safer than the other.

But supporting off-street bicycle paths because they are "safe"; while rejecting on-street bicycle facilities because they are "unsafe" is not supported by the evidence. On-street bicycling is safer than sidewalk or bicycle path riding, and adding bicycle facilities to streets improves the safety yet again.

11. Moritz, William E., "Regular Adult Bicyclists in Washington State," ASCE Transportation Congress, San Diego, 1995.

12. Jerrold Kaplan, "Characteristics of the Regular Adult Bicycle User," FHWA, 1975. (NTIS Document PB 258-399)

Data compiled by Dr. Brent Hugh (bhugh@mwsc.edu)

[Return to Brent Hugh's Home Page]